Canton Fair opens with surge in overseas buyers

This photo taken on April 15, 2024 shows an energy utilization solution exhibited at a booth during the 135th session of the China Import and Export Fair in Guangzhou, South China’s Guangdong province. [Photo/Xinhua]

The 135th session of the China Import and Export Fair, also known as the Canton Fair, opened in Guangzhou, provincial capital of South China’s Guangdong province, April 15.

As of Sunday, about 149,000 purchasers from 215 countries and regions had completed pre-registration for the event, marking a notable 17.4 percent increase compared to the previous edition.

The eagerness of overseas buyers to participate has intensified, with a growing influx of purchasers from the United States, Middle Eastern countries, the Belt and Road Initiative participating countries, and member countries of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership.

Scheduled to run until May 5, the fair boasts around 74,000 exhibition booths, and over 29,000 exhibitors are expected to participate.

The exhibition, which spans an area of 1.55 million square meters, covers various sectors, including smart manufacturing, new-energy vehicles, lithium batteries, and solar cells.

Organizers have planned over 600 trade promotion activities, further enhancing the scope and reach of the fair.

Launched in 1957 and held twice annually, the fair is considered a major gauge of China’s foreign trade.

Using Chinese-made ships as targets for military exercises is a ridiculous stunt by Philippines: Global Times editorial

Illustration: Liu Rui/GT

Illustration: Liu Rui/GT

The “Balikatan” or “shoulder-to-shoulder” military drills between the Philippines and the US haven’t even started, but a clumsy political performance has taken the stage ahead of time. The Philippine military first publicly announced that in the “sinking exercise” segment, the retired Philippine Navy replenishment tanker “BRP Lake Caliraya” would be selected as the target. This ship was originally manufactured in China and was used by Philippine enterprises as a civilian oil tanker. It is the Philippines’ only “Chinese-made naval asset.” The Philippine military also firmly stated that this decision was “not intentional” and does not signify any specific country. It also stated that this joint military exercise is not targeting any foreign country, including China. It is a ludicrous performance by Manila.

The “BRP Lake Caliraya,” formerly “MT Lapu-Lapu,” was an oil tanker built by a Chinese shipyard for the Philippine National Oil Company, and was also a witness to previous cooperation between China and the Philippines. It was later converted by the Philippine Navy into its first-ever replenishment ship. The Philippine side is preparing to use it as a target in a simulated “enemy ship” scenario, showing clear provocative intent. However, they are attempting to cover it up and refuse to acknowledge it, making the farcical claim that it is “not intentional.” This approach of trying to have it both ways has turned Manila into a joke in the region and is an example of its opportunistic behavior in the entire South China Sea issue.

It must be pointed out that the nature of this “shoulder-to-shoulder” military exercise is extremely negative. Not only will the scale exceed that of previous years, but the US and the Philippines will also conduct exercises for the first time in disputed areas beyond 12 nautical miles from Philippine territorial waters. The Philippine Coast Guard will deploy six vessels for this exercise for the first time. Additionally, the navies of the Philippines, the US, and France will conduct trilateral joint patrols for the first time. Compared to the staged nature of the “sinking exercise,” the several “firsts” touted by the US and the Philippines pose a substantive threat to regional stability, which should lead regional countries to maintain high vigilance.

In particular, the US is currently making arbitrary demands from the Philippines. The US previously hinted at deploying mid-range missile systems in the “Indo-Pacific region,” making it the first time since the end of the Cold War. An article from Singapore-based newspaper Lianhe Zaobao said that external observers have been guessing where the US would deploy the system, as well as “which country would be willing to risk directly offending China,” and most commentaries guessed it would be deployed in Guam, or even in Japan – “no one thought it would be the Philippines.” Manila seems open to all American allies, even signing new defense cooperation agreements with the EU and the UK. Japan, Canada, and France are also in line to sign the visiting forces agreement with the Philippines. The country has now become a “broken window” in the region and even feels complacent about it. Some foreign media commented that Philippine President Ferdinand Romualdez Marcos Jr. is feeding the Philippines a bitter pill coated in sugar. Of course, it is not a bitter pill; it is poison.

Since taking office, Marcos Jr. has not made much progress in the country’s economic and social governance, nor has he prioritized addressing the urgent issues of hunger, poverty, drugs, and crime in the Philippines. The latest domestic polls in the Philippines show that Marcos Jr.’s national approval rating and trust in his administration have significantly dropped by 13 and 16 percentage points, respectively, with voices in the House of Representatives calling for his resignation. Marcos Jr. may be hoping to gain some face and support by stirring up trouble in the South China Sea and attracting American support in the realm of diplomacy. However, this approach is not beneficial for Manila in the short or long term. China is the Philippines’ largest trading partner, and the power gap between the two countries is evident. What is Manila really after through its repeated provocations?

Perhaps Marcos Jr. is fantasizing about exchanging economic investments with the US by cooperating with it in its competition with China. But, the problem is that the US has been the Philippines’ most important ally for the past few decades. If the US really wanted to help the Philippines, would it have waited until today? During the recent US-Japan-Philippines summit, Manila expressed hope that the US and Japan would invest $100 billion in the Philippines. To outsiders, it seems like the Philippines is demanding support from the US against China, but what it received was a vague promise of “stimulating $100 billion in investment” from the US and Japan. Just from this one detail, it is clear that the Philippines cannot possibly obtain the benefits it desires by cooperating with Washington, let alone solve its increasingly serious domestic development issues.

The current situation in the South China Sea is generally stable, but the US and the Philippines are constantly causing trouble, trying to drag down and consume China. China will never fall for it.

From China’s attitude in the past few months, it can be seen that we have left room and flexibility for the Philippines on the South China Sea issue, in the hope that the current disputes can be resolved through communication, negotiation, and dialogue. However, whether it is at Ren’ai Jiao, Huangyan Dao, or other reefs and islands, the Philippines is still acting unilaterally. We hope that the Philippines will not allow the “spiritual victory” of sinking target ships to make them too excited, leading to the illusion that they can take on real ships. China’s restraint is not unlimited, and if the Philippines and external forces cross the bottom line and red line of peace and stability in the South China Sea, China will definitely take action when necessary, which is something the Philippines cannot afford.

Israel launches missile attacks on Iran

A member of the Israeli military stands next to an Iranian ballistic missile, which fell in Israel on the weekend, at the Julis military base near the southern Israeli city of Kiryat Malachi, April 16, 2024. /CFP

A member of the Israeli military stands next to an Iranian ballistic missile, which fell in Israel on the weekend, at the Julis military base near the southern Israeli city of Kiryat Malachi, April 16, 2024. /CFP

Israeli missiles have hit a site in Iran, ABC News reported late on Thursday, citing a U.S. official, while Iranian state media reported explosions, days after Iran launched a retaliatory missile and drone strike on Israel.

Iran’s Fars news agency reported “three explosions” were heard near the Shekari army airbase in the northwest of Isfahan province, while Iran’s space agency spokesman Hossein Dalirian said “several” drones had been “successfully shot down.” “There are no reports of a missile attack for now,” Dalirian said on social media platform X.

Nuclear facilities in Isfahan were reported to be “completely secure,” Iran’s Tasnim news agency reported, citing “reliable sources.”

Iran suspended flights and activated its air defense system over several cities, multiple media outlets reported on Friday, citing Iran’s official news agency IRNA. 

Tehran’s Imam Khomeini International Airport was closed to all flights until 0700 GMT, according to a notice to airmen posted on a U.S. Federal Aviation Administration database.

Some Emirates and Flydubai flights that were flying over Iran early on Friday made sudden sharp turns away from the airspace, according to flight paths shown on tracking website Flightradar24.

The Israeli military told AFP: “We don’t have a comment at this time.”

Israel had said it would respond to Iran’s attack on Israel last weekend, which was a response to Israeli attacks on an Iranian consulate in Syria in early April. 

Analysts and observers have been raising concerns about the risks of the Israel-Hamas conflict spreading into the rest of the region.

Iran told the United Nations Security Council on Thursday that Israel “must be compelled to stop any further military adventurism against our interests,” as the UN secretary-general warned that the Middle East was in a “moment of maximum peril.”

Oil prices jumped with the reports of the Israeli strike. Brent crude futures rose 2 percent to $88.86 a barrel, the dollar gained broadly, gold rose 1 percent and S&P 500 futures dropped 1 percent.

(With input from agencies)

EU summit urges boosting competitiveness, saying ‘no time to waste’

European Council summit is held at the EU headquarters in Brussels, April 18, 2024. /CFP

European Council summit is held at the EU headquarters in Brussels, April 18, 2024. /CFP

The European Council’s special two-day summit wrapped up in Brussels on Thursday, vowing to enhance the European Union’s competitiveness amid the drastic global shifts and close up the gap with the U.S.

“In the face of a new geopolitical reality and increasingly complex challenges, the European Union is committed to acting decisively to ensure its long-term competitiveness, prosperity and leadership on the global stage and to strengthen its strategic sovereignty,” leaders agreed at the summit.

European Council President Charles Michel emphasized the bloc’s over-reliance on external economic and security bases, which he argued undermines the EU’s competitiveness and global influence.

Affected by factors such as intensified geopolitical tensions, continued monetary tightening, and weak global demand, the European economy continues to be sluggish in 2024, particularly evident in manufacturing and energy-intensive industries.

Preliminary statistical data released by Eurostat at the end of January showed that the economies of the Eurozone and the EU experienced zero growth in the fourth quarter of last year compared with the previous quarter. The European Trade Union Confederation reported last month that nearly 1 million manufacturing jobs had been lost in the EU over the past four years.

The summit highlighted nine key areas to drive competitiveness, such as deepening the single market, developing and implementing effective industrial policies, and increasing investments through the Capital Markets Union (CMU) and the European Investment Bank.

‘No time to waste’

EU Leaders heard a proposal for an EU-wide effort to subsidize industrial companies in response to the Biden administration’s Inflation Reduction Act, which provides funds, various tax credits, grants and loans toward industrial sectors that can reduce carbon emissions, and triggered concerns among EU leaders that U.S. subsidies for its domestic production are drawing investment from Europe and threatening the loss of industrial jobs on the continent.

The proposals, contained in a report from former Italian Prime Minister Enrico Letta, who cautioned there is “no time to waste” and a narrowing window to address the widening economic gap with the U.S.

The report stated that rising protectionism threatens the EU’s economic security and undermines its development in technological fields such as artificial intelligence and clean technology. It outlined the critical need for funding to support the EU’s goals in green and digital transitions, EU enlargement and defense enhancements.

Letta pointed to the EU’s 33 trillion euros ($35 trillion) in private savings as an underutilized resource, and highlighted that approximately 300 billion euros of EU family savings are redirected abroad each year, predominantly flowing into the American economy and managed by U.S. asset managers.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen stressed that the EU could raise an additional round of about 470 billion euros a year in funding from the capital markets if the EU completed the CMU.

Michel also supported leveraging the CMU to channel these funds into European companies, likening the initiative to the U.S.’ Inflation Reduction Act, which allocated nearly $400 billion to subsidize domestic production.

Divisions

Despite the endorsement of the CMU as it was written in the European Council conclusions document, divisions among EU leaders remain evident. While France and Germany backed the initiative, the majority of the EU’s 27 member states expressed reservations about losing national control and expanding EU regulatory powers.

Estonian Prime Minister Kaja Kallas voiced concerns about losing competitive advantages such as their tax system. Meanwhile, Irish Prime Minister Simon Harris emphasized the need for careful implementation of the capital markets union without excessive centralization, particularly opposing the harmonization of corporate taxes.

The summit communique also reiterated EU’s support for Ukraine, but analysts believe that the limitations on the bloc’s own defense industrial base and production capacity make it difficult to fulfill more of its commitments to Ukraine.

On the Middle East situation, EU leaders urged all parties to exercise the utmost restraint and avoid any actions that could escalate tensions in the region. They agreed to implement more restrictive measures against Iran, specifically targeting unmanned aerial vehicles and missiles.

(With input from Xinhua)

South Korean president’s approval rating drops to 23%, shows poll

South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol (front) walks with Prime Minister Han Duck-soo into a meeting in Seoul, South Korea, April 26, 2024. /CFP

South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol (front) walks with Prime Minister Han Duck-soo into a meeting in Seoul, South Korea, April 26, 2024. /CFP

South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol’s approval rating dropped 11 percentage points to 23 percent this week, compared with three weeks earlier, a weekly poll showed Friday.

The negative assessment of Yoon’s conduct of state affairs soared 10 percentage points to 68 percent, according to local pollster Gallup Korea.

Support for the ruling conservative People Power Party dipped 7 percentage points to 30 percent this week, compared with the fourth week of March.

The main liberal opposition Democratic Party’s popularity rating gained 2 percentage points to 31 percent.

The minor left-leaning Rebuilding Korea Party posted a 14 percent support score this week, while the minor center-right New Reform Party logged a 3 percent approval score.

The results were based on a survey of 1,000 voters conducted from Tuesday to Thursday. 

Source(s): Xinhua News Agency

Japan’s discharge of Fukushima nuclear-contaminated wastewater extremely irresponsible: Chinese Foreign Ministry

A logo of Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO), the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant’s operator. /CMG

A logo of Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO), the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant’s operator. /CMG

Japan on Friday started the fifth round of release of nuclear-contaminated wastewater from the crippled Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean.

Despite opposition among local fishermen and residents as well as backlash from the international community, Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO), the plant’s operator, started discharging the radioactive wastewater in the morning, the first round in fiscal 2024.

Similar to the previous four rounds, about 7,800 tonnes of the wastewater, which still contains tritium, a radioactive substance, will be discharged until May 7.

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian said at the daily briefing that China firmly opposes Japan’s insistence on initiating the fifth round of discharging nuclear-contaminated water into the ocean, which is extremely irresponsible and brings a risk to the world.

Japan unilaterally initiated the discharge regardless of concerns over the safety of the action, the reliability of the purification equipment for the long term and the effectiveness of the monitoring management, Lin said.

He emphasized that the discharge is related to the health of all humanity, the global marine environment and international public interests. “Japan should address legitimate concerns both domestically and internationally and handle them responsibly and constructively,” he said.

China urges Japan to cooperate with neighboring countries to jointly build up valid long-term international monitoring management to prevent the irreversible consequences of the discharge, Lin added.

The fishery industry and local residents have long opposed the discharge plan. About 150 fishermen and residents from Fukushima and Miyagi Prefectures filed a lawsuit against the Japanese government and TEPCO at the Fukushima District Court on September 8, 2023, demanding they stop releasing nuclear-contaminated water into the ocean.

“The act itself of discharging large amounts of radioactive substances into the sea is bad for the environment. It’s not surprising that China and South Korea are concerned about the discharge of nuclear-contaminated water into the sea. If the discharge is unattended, it will lay hidden dangers in the future,” said Masashi Goto, a member of the Citizens’ Commission on Nuclear Energy, an independent research and advocacy body established after the Fukushima disaster in order to devise a new, comprehensive, ethical and viable policy concerning nuclear power phaseout and related issues in Japan.

“It seems as long as the water is diluted, it can be safely discharged into the sea. This is simply ignorance of safety. This approach cannot be called safe at all,” he said.

On March 4, the lawsuit held its first public hearing at the Fukushima District Court, and the number of people signed on as plaintiffs has grown from about 150 to over 360.

The Fukushima nuclear-contaminated water release began in August 2023, and a total of about 31,200 tonnes of water was released in four rounds in fiscal 2023, which ended in March.

In fiscal 2024, TEPCO plans to discharge a total of 54,600 tonnes of contaminated water in seven rounds, which contains approximately 14 trillion becquerels of tritium.

(With input from Xinhua)

Dengue cases surge by nearly 50 percent in Americas, UN agency says

Dengue cases have created an “emergency situation” in the Americas, although cases in hotspots Argentina and Brazil appear to have stabilized, the head of the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) said on Thursday.

PAHO, a United Nations agency, has confirmed more than 5.2 million cases of dengue across the Americas this year, an over 48 percent jump from the 3.5 million cases the group reported late last month.

A patient with dengue fever walks inside the Sergio E. Bernales National Hospital on the outskirts of Lima, Peru, April 17, 2024. /CFP

A patient with dengue fever walks inside the Sergio E. Bernales National Hospital on the outskirts of Lima, Peru, April 17, 2024. /CFP

More than 1,800 people have died from the mosquito-borne viral illness, up from over 1,000 deaths reported last month in the year through March.

“We have an emergency situation,” PAHO Director Jarbas Barbosa said in a press briefing.

The countries so far hit the hardest in the current outbreak, Argentina and Brazil, “still have a very strong transmission,” Barbosa said, adding that “in recent weeks there seems to be a stabilization, or even a reduction” in the countries’ cases.

Barbosa warned that the supply of an existing dengue vaccine is “very limited” and even widespread vaccination would not have an immediate impact on interrupting the ongoing outbreak.

“The dengue vaccine can play an important role in reducing severe cases of deaths, but it will take time until the effects of the vaccine can be reflected in the decrease in dengue cases,” Barbosa said.

Dengue symptoms include fever, headaches, vomiting, skin rashes, as well as muscle and joint pain. In some cases, it can cause more severe hemorrhagic fever, resulting in bleeding that can lead to death.

(Cover: A dose of a dengue vaccine in Belo Horizonte state of Minas Gerais, Brazil, February 2, 2024. /CFP)

Source(s): Reuters

Huizhou’s traditional dwellings welcome spring

00:31

Spring colors Huizhou’s traditional dwellings with a vibrant burst of hues. Peach blossoms paint delicate pink strokes against the backdrop of black-tiled roofs and white walls. Residents have gathered these blossoms to fill their homes with the fragrance and essence of spring.

Sweet Planet: A milk tea shop in the Netherlands

01:04

Lucia Parlanti’s business journey began with a visit to China. Based on her experience of Chinese tea culture, she created her “Tea Stories” shop in the Netherlands, where she fuses Eastern and Western beverages. The combination of Chinese tea culture and Western tastes highlights the power of cross-cultural exchange and modern reinterpretations of tradition to create something with universal appeal.